at the conclusion of my first year in the United States Senate, as we were approaching the new year, I was asked, ``Well, what was your greatest disappointment?'' I indicated at the time that my single greatest disappointment was the fact that we had been unable to defeat in this body the Nation's largest tax increase in its history; the largest tax increase in its history. And then, with all the business that we deal with here in the Senate, the pain of that loss began to ameliorate and we moved on to other activities and I did not think about it every day. And then, as we come upon tomorrow, April 15, when the bill comes due, all the memories of that 7-month battle renew themselves for me. Everybody is writing about the impact and the effect. None of it makes very good reading, Mr. President. I was reading an article by Alan Reynolds of the Hudson Institute that appeared in the Wall Street Journal on April 12. He goes back to that long, arduous battle over the fact that, well, this tax increase is not going to affect many Americans; just 1.2 percent, I believe, was the figure that kept being used, just a small number of Americans and, therefore, we should excuse the fact that we are imposing this economic burden on America because it did not affect very many people. This article says, if that were true, that would equate to 1.4 million Americans. But it goes on to say: This is much worse than misleading.…
Paul Coverdell: “at the conclusion of my first year in the United States Senate, as we were approaching the new year, I was asked…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the largest tax increase in U.S. history during a Senate floor speech.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
this tax has been discussed at length over the last several years. Several years ago, we reduced some of the impact of this tax, but not much. This tax is among the most often raised issues when I am among constituents. A number of people…
With respect to the so-called ``809'' benefits the Africa and CBI programs, is it the intent of managers that apparel articles remain eligible for duty-free and quota-free treatment when the fabric is cut both in the United States and the…
I think we are making headway on this. The implication that the education savings account is a vehicle for people who drive around in limousines is inaccurate. The Joint Tax Committee has found the education savings accounts would be used…
it is interesting that so much of our labor law dates back to the mid-1930s. H.R. 5 is a measure that deals with modernizing attitudes about work habits and workers and bringing them into the new century. It was in 1935, during the Great…





