I have several comments to make with regard to that. Before I outline the reach of the legislation, I will respond to several remarks made by the Senator from Massachusetts. First, the Senator from Massachusetts indicated that the President's budget had $4.5 billion in new funding for education and that we are debating something that is worth some $200 million over 5 years. My data does not match his. Actually, in 5 years this legislation would use tax policy to relieve taxpayers, whether they are parents or employers or people who are in a State tuition program. It would be $4.3 billion in the first 5 years and almost $8 billion over 10 years. They really are apples and oranges. What we are debating is the relief of tax policy on top of what will ultimately become an increase in the education budget. In fact, if you are going to do it that way, you have to add these figures to what the President and the Congress ultimately decide is going to be the increase in the education budget, remembering that last year the Congress' increase in education was greater than the President's.
Paul Coverdell: “I have several comments to make with regard to that. Before I outline the reach of the legislation, I will respond to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax policy related to education funding during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
the bottom line, whether you call it a tax increase or reduction of a tax relief proposal, the net effect is between $4 billion and $6 billion is not going to be in the checking accounts of American citizens if this amendment is adopted…
this tax has been discussed at length over the last several years. Several years ago, we reduced some of the impact of this tax, but not much. This tax is among the most often raised issues when I am among constituents. A number of people…
Anybody who predicts the legislative process is probably the same person who gets his own attorney.
the Senate just conducted two very significant and unprecedented votes--unprecedented in the respect that, as the good chairman of the Senate Armed Services committee has pointed out, this is the first time that the Congress has taken…





