I believe, as I said, this proposal moves to failure. A State that has met its responsibilities and kept schools up to the level they should be doesn't meet the criteria in the amendment for the funding. The second point, and probably for me the most significant, is that this amendment obviates and destroys the education savings account that we have been discussing now for almost 6 months. This education savings account offers modest tax relief, which causes Americans to do very big things. About $500 million-plus tax relief on the interest buildup in the savings account will cause 14 million families, according to the Joint Tax Committee, to open such an account and save, of their own money, $5 billion in 5 years, over $10 billion in 10 years, all of which comes to the direct support of a child's need--tutor, computer, transportation, afterschool program, uniform; it goes on. So with just a modest incentive offered from the Federal Government, we cause Americans to step forward and give massive support to education.
Paul Coverdell: “I believe, as I said, this proposal moves to failure. A State that has met its responsibilities and kept schools up to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about school construction and education savings accounts during a debate.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
My colleague would agree, would he not, that the merit pay might keep that good teacher in that system longer than otherwise? At some point, we know we are losing good teachers because outside interests are seeking that kind of talent.
the bipartisan education savings account which was passed in March and had been threatened by a veto from the President makes education more affordable for millions of Americans. I might say, during that debate of our proposal to empower…
I rise against the amendment of the Senator from Minnesota. I associate myself with the remarks of the Senator from Delaware. I would like to try to not repeat everything that has been said but try to underscore several fundamental basic…
I thought I distinctly understood the Senator from Washington comment that it was represented in committee that portability was indeed a voucher.





