And now the question to my good friend from New York: These new issues that are coming out almost on a weekly basis, do we know that these questions that are called unanswered are in the purview of the special prosecutor? In other words, does he have a rolling authority that moves to the next question to the next question to the next question, or is there a box that he is operating in, and that we must seize upon these issues coming from around the world? Where is the line of demarcation for the special prosecutor?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the authority and scope of the special prosecutor during a discussion.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
I want to commend Senator Simpson from Wyoming for his amendment in the current debate. I am a cosponsor of it. I have not spoken on it directly this morning because last evening there was unanimous consent on my amendment that dealt with…
I rise to strongly endorse the comments made by the Republican leader in calling for a congressional resolution with regard to the tragic circumstances in Bosnia. This morning we had a very eloquent presentation in the Foreign Relations…
the urgency is not defined in the postal department's own clarification, just that they sometime--I guess it was in 1978--in 1978, in deference to the emergence of private carriers, concluded that they could be used if it was an urgent…
As the State of Georgia undertakes the necessary steps to implement the National Voter Registration Act, we are more and more concerned about the cost of this federally imposed mandate. At one time in the discussions of motor voter, to…





