I rise in support of his, and others, balanced budget amendment and in opposition to the amendment of the Senator from Nevada. I would like to just make several comments with regard to what I view has turned into three spears at the amendment, three arguments that are being consistently made against the balanced budget amendment. First, we have heard for weeks that the balanced budget amendment, as offered by the Senator from Illinois and others, is a gimmick. Let me just say that I think that argument has been rendered moot by the intensity of the lobbying to defeat the amendment. Clearly, if all the sectors who have so vigorously opposed this amendment thought it was but a gimmick, we would simply let politics be politics and go home. But, indeed, that has not been the case. Throughout the Nation, we have had such an intense effort to characterize and belittle the amendment, first classifying it as a gimmick. It is not a gimmick. It is the first serious attempt on the part of this Senate and the people of this country to bring into control runaway debt that will bring this Nation to its knees.
Paul Coverdell: “I rise in support of his, and others, balanced budget amendment and in opposition to the amendment of the Senator from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for a balanced budget amendment and countering arguments against it.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
I will be very brief. The Senator from Virginia and I have an honorable disagreement about how the Federal Government ought to respond to being a better partner in education. But the one issue that I would take some exception to and would…
When the Act requires yarn to be ``wholly formed'' in the United States, am I correct that the intention of the managers is to require that all processes necessary to convert fibers into yarns-- i.e., spinning, extruding--be performed in…
School construction and renovation is traditionally the responsibility of local and State governments. It traditionally has been and it still is. The Robb amendment, in effect, has the effect of raising taxes by $4.2 billion over 5 years…
the bottom line, whether you call it a tax increase or reduction of a tax relief proposal, the net effect is between $4 billion and $6 billion is not going to be in the checking accounts of American citizens if this amendment is adopted…





