I know it has been said many times but I think everybody should see a caution flag go up when the Republican National Committee, the National Taxpayers Union, the National Right to Life Committee, the National Rifle Association, the American Civil liberties Union, the Christian Coalition, Direct Marketing Association, National Association of Broadcasters, National Association of Business PAC's, National Education Association, the complete political spectrum, all are opposed to this legislation. Why? Because it is an infringement on the first amendment of the Constitution of the United States. It is that simple.
Paul Coverdell: “I know it has been said many times but I think everybody should see a caution flag go up when the Republican National…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing opposition to legislation seen as infringing on the First Amendment rights.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
the bottom line, whether you call it a tax increase or reduction of a tax relief proposal, the net effect is between $4 billion and $6 billion is not going to be in the checking accounts of American citizens if this amendment is adopted…
Why should we do that? This is a classic example: Let's tell them what is important to them. You think it is important it only be for college. I think it ought to be up to the family to decide where and when they have a special need. Maybe…
I understand that it is the managers' intent that under the Caribbean Basin portion of the Act, an apparel article containing elastomeric yarns, including elestomeric filament yarns, shall be eligible for the de minimis rule set forth in…
With respect to the so-called ``809'' benefits the Africa and CBI programs, is it the intent of managers that apparel articles remain eligible for duty-free and quota-free treatment when the fabric is cut both in the United States and the…





