In my opening comments I was talking about an average Georgia family, and I alluded to the fact that virtually half their income has been absorbed by one government or another. You and the Senator from Tennessee have used the figure 40 percent. I thought we might clarify that a bit. Would the Senator agree that a family's interest payments that are a direct result of our national debt should also be added into what is being taken from them?
Discussing the financial burden on families due to government income absorption and national debt.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
I thought I distinctly understood the Senator from Washington comment that it was represented in committee that portability was indeed a voucher.
Now, with respect to the provisions of the Africa and Caribbean Basin programs that deal with fabric or yarn not widely available in commercial quantities, am I correct that it is the intent of the managers that these provisions should be…
It is clear to me that Fort Stewart needs more military construction dollars. However, I also understand that the committee and the Pentagon have certain parameters within they work to determine military construction dollars. I understand…
I understand that it is the managers' intent that under the Caribbean Basin portion of the Act, an apparel article containing elastomeric yarns, including elestomeric filament yarns, shall be eligible for the de minimis rule set forth in…
Other voices in this conversation
