the urgency is not defined in the postal department's own clarification, just that they sometime--I guess it was in 1978--in 1978, in deference to the emergence of private carriers, concluded that they could be used if it was an urgent matter; in other words, needed to arrive within 24 or 48 hours or something of that nature. But at that time it was clearly left up to the user to determine whether it was urgent or not. And to ratify or certify my point, you had to pay at least double to do that. So the Postal Service was setting a standard which was monetary. Now they come forward and say even though you met that standard, you paid the additional money, we still do not think it is urgent. They are claiming the right, and I do not believe this Government has given them that prerogative. So all this does is you do not take on the issue of monopoly, but we go back to the original premise that if the private citizen or business was willing to pay the added cost, they therefore had identified it as urgent.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Postal Service's definition of urgency in relation to private carriers.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
The Educational Opportunities and Excellence Act of 1999 is a broad effort to offer new reforms to K-12 education.
I first met Richard Nixon as the director of what was to become his last political parade in October 1972. The parade just happened to be in Atlanta. Yet, by the time of that first meeting, Richard Nixon had already had a profound affect…
The bill requires that 95% of federal education dollars are spent on classroom activities, rather than Washington based bureaucracies.
And now the question to my good friend from New York: These new issues that are coming out almost on a weekly basis, do we know that these questions that are called unanswered are in the purview of the special prosecutor? In other words…





