Maybe it is just a disagreement between the two of us about what constitutes wealth. I do not consider families, middle-income, earning $75,000 or less, as wealthy people. Maybe the Senator from Illinois or some other analysis does, but I do not. I think this is the backbone of the country. They are the people who bear the largest burden of the Tax Code. They are having a hard time. Their income tax is at the highest level since World War II. It is so high now that with the disposable income available to them, to do the things we expect them to do about raising their families, they cannot do any more. So we may just have a disagreement over who is considered wealthy.
Paul Coverdell: “Maybe it is just a disagreement between the two of us about what constitutes wealth. I do not consider families…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the definition of wealth and the tax burden on middle-income families.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
The demographics in parochial schools and private schools--and we studied this very closely--are within 10 percent, the same as demographics in public schools. Parochial schools, for example, in New York, have identical demographics as the…
I rise specifically today about events that are under advisement this minute in Peru. As those who follow events there know, very aggressive behavior by President Fujimori led to a constitutional override of a two-term limitation on his…
Why should we do that? This is a classic example: Let's tell them what is important to them. You think it is important it only be for college. I think it ought to be up to the family to decide where and when they have a special need. Maybe…
from rural Georgia to Capitol Hill, Americans recognize the immeasurable contribution that President and Mrs. Ronald Reagan have made to our Nation. Their support is most welcome.





