I want to reiterate a point, before I yield to the Senator from Idaho, that was made by the Senator from Mississippi when he opened this discussion. He pointed out that this vote is to allow the States to take up the issue of whether or not the Constitution should be amended. The other side does not even want the States to carry on and conduct the debate of this great national issue. They do not want to let it go to the States. I find that uniquely Washingtonian. "No. We have to keep it all here. We don't dare let the States debate this great issue and make their voices heard." It takes three-fourths of them to ratify this before it would become an amendment to the Constitution.
Paul Coverdell: “I want to reiterate a point, before I yield to the Senator from Idaho, that was made by the Senator from Mississippi…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of allowing states to debate a constitutional amendment.
Share
More from Paul Coverdell
Let me say that every year since the Republicans gained the majority we have worked to increase the maximum Pell grant. For more than 7 years, the Pell grant maximum fluctuated between $2,300 and $2,400. Last year, the President's budget…
I will be very brief. The Senator from Virginia and I have an honorable disagreement about how the Federal Government ought to respond to being a better partner in education. But the one issue that I would take some exception to and would…
With respect to the so-called ``809'' benefits the Africa and CBI programs, is it the intent of managers that apparel articles remain eligible for duty-free and quota-free treatment when the fabric is cut both in the United States and the…
America has a reading deficit! According to the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS), 41 million adults are unable to perform even the simplest literacy tasks. The most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) conducted…





