Let me start, I guess, with what I find to be the most puzzling part of the whole experience. You and I in a couple of weeks will be going to Russia on a second trip to try to say to the Russians less bureaucracy, less centralization, less Government control, more marketplaces, more incentive, more entrepreneurship. In that context, beyond the debating points, does it not worry you to be setting up a national health board--I do not have the exact number at my fingertips--with something like 17 new mandates in this bill? I could cite them if you doubt it. Does it not worry you that the design--and I sympathize with the goals and I know it is hard to come in as a brand-new Administration with all the paperwork and confusion to try to actually write a bill like this. But doesn't it worry you that the Clinton bill is in fact everything we are telling Boris Yeltsin to quit doing?
On the recordMarch 16, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of the Clinton health care bill during a discussion on U.S.-Russia relations.
Share
More from Newt Gingrich
May 15, 2023
We should not interfere directly with home rule. Those of us who visit and who come here only for the purpose of representing our communities do not have the knowledge and do not have the right to micromanage the daily lives of the people…
Jul 19, 2022
The greatest problem Washington has today is its inability to learn what works and what fails in the real world.
Jul 19, 2022
We have got to help families, we have got to get our inflation under control, but we also have to understand we have got to quit spending for our families, for our children.





