as I listen to the debate on this bill, and I agree with the majority of this bill, I heard the word ``tribe'' used over and over, and I think that was the intent of this, for Native American tribes to be recognized and be given the housing assistance and also the infrastructure assistance and all the things that they need. And I think it is very important that we recognize exactly who these tribes are. What this amendment does, it strikes the section about the Native Hawaiians. Native Hawaiians share none of the unique characteristics possessed by recognized tribes in this country. Native Hawaiians never exercised sovereignty over Hawaiian lands or lived as a separate, distinct, racially exclusive community. All Hawaiians were subject to the same monarch in the late 1800s, regardless of race. Native Hawaiians have never exercised inherent sovereignty as a native indigenous people, and our Constitution seeks to eliminate racial separation, not promote it. How can we promote equality while separating our people? Tribes seeking recognition after statehood must adhere to a process established by the Federal Government. To be formally recognized, a tribe must demonstrate it has operated as a sovereign entity for the past century, was a separate and distinct community, and had a preexisting political organization. The Native Hawaiian people cannot meet these criteria. The time for Native Hawaiians to establish themselves as an Indian tribe has since passed.
Lynn A. Westmoreland: “as I listen to the debate on this bill, and I agree with the majority of this bill, I heard the word ``tribe'' used over…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the recognition of Native American tribes and the status of Native Hawaiians.
Share
More from Lynn A. Westmoreland
It is my fundamental belief that we have local solutions to local problems, and that is one of the reasons I am such a big supporter of expanding the Moving to Work Program.
We want to make sure that those policyholders, the people who pay the premiums, are the first to be protected.
Since Dodd-Frank passed, all we have seen is the uncertainty and the harm this law has brought to working Americans and small businesses.
Instead of focusing on fundamentals like shrinking their portfolio, reducing risk, and charging a premium that is in line with risk, FHA has advanced a policy that can only be described as out of bounds from its original intent.





