well, there was an example of the misleading hyperbole that we have heard for the last several weeks on Republican programs. My friend from Hawaii talks about a bill that passed last week that protected billionaires and, in fact, the bill never addressed the issue. It never addressed the issue. The Senate put some language in a bill that would have dealt with punishing people who leave the United States because of confiscatory taxation. The Senate then receded from their position, because the language was too loose, and the House Committee on Ways and Means could not draft language. Indeed, in the Committee on Rules in discussion of this bill, the issue was raised, and the Democrats dropped the issue and apologized for the misleading information they brought us, because it was not in the bill. It was not in the House-passed bill. It was not in the conference committee report. And, indeed, not a single Democrat on the Committee on Rules voted against the rule that brought the bill to the floor, and now overnight, overnight, they discovered another class- warfare angle and started misleading America about what was in the bill. The bill was to return the exemption for health care premiums for single farmers, for private property owners that had nothing to do with what the gentleman from Hawaii spoke about.
JOHN LINDER: “well, there was an example of the misleading hyperbole that we have heard for the last several weeks on Republican…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing claims about a bill related to taxation and health care premiums during a floor debate.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
I simply cannot support the creation of a new entitlement that would send another $8.5 billion in unpaid-for Federal spending out the door.
I thank Chairman Hyde for the time. I hope my colleagues will all join in support of H. Res. 994. Mr. Speaker, 5 years ago I stood on the House floor and proclaimed that I was not without hope for America's ability to eliminate the scourge…
ATMs ran out of cash, so now we have no idea how those funds were spent, but I suspect many can guess. The Subcommittee on Welfare, on which I serve, recently had a hearing on this fund. One witness noted taxpayers already spend an…
Mr. Speaker, we are asked to believe that $34 billion in spending in this new bill is an emergency and thus need not be paid for. But since this is the eighth extension of UI benefits in the past 2 years, Members need to ask, can the…





