Political Quotes

JOHN LINDER: Drip, drip, drip. Here we are for yet another extension of unemployment benefits and various related programs. These…

On the recordMarch 17, 2010
Drip, drip, drip. Here we are for yet another extension of unemployment benefits and various related programs. These programs have been repeatedly extended, even as Democrats claim their economic stimulus plan has worked and is creating jobs. Well, it's not, and our presence on this floor today is yet another affirmation of that obvious fact. If stimulus was working, more people would have paychecks. But it's not, so we are here to hand out more unemployment checks instead. Let's review the history of just the unemployment benefit extensions we are continuing today. In June 2008, Congress created a new Federal "temporary" unemployment benefit program paying 13 weeks of unemployment benefits, on top of 26 weeks of State benefits. CBO said the UI portion of that bill would cost $14 billion. Unemployment was 5.5 percent. In November 2008, that temporary program was expanded by 20 weeks of benefits--for a new total of 59 weeks of UI per person. CBO said that would cost just under $6 billion. Unemployment was 6.9 percent. In February 2009, Democrats' stimulus plan extended the temporary program through 2009 and nationalized the Federal/State extended benefits program, among other changes. That added another 20 weeks of Federal benefits, for a total of up to 79 weeks per person. CBO said that would cost $40 billion. Unemployment was 8.2 percent.
Said by
JOHN LINDER
Georgia
Source
govinfo.gov
Mar 17, 2010

Editor's note · Context

The speaker is addressing the repeated extensions of unemployment benefits and the effectiveness of the economic stimulus plan.

Share

More from JOHN LINDER

Mar 21, 2016

If you really want to help working families move up that ladder, you have to deal with the payroll Tax Code.

congress.gov
Sep 23, 2004

Wealthy people pay taxes on personal consumption, and wealth has no meaning unless it is spent on personal consumption. If I had $100 million and lived in a $20,000 home and drove a used car, that $100 million would mean nothing to me. So…

govinfo.gov
Sep 23, 2004

The average income earner pays a 28 percent withholding tax and 7.65 percent, their share of the payroll tax. Their increase in take-home pay would be about 55 percent the next day.

govinfo.gov
Mar 24, 2010

I oppose this legislation. Since the Democrats' 2009 stimulus law, 3.3 million jobs have been eliminated, not the 3.7 million jobs they forecast it would create. Unemployment has risen to 10 percent, not the 8 percent peak Democrats…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation