sometime during the year 2013, the funds we pay out to Social Security recipients are going to exceed the funds coming in to finance the system. Despite the White House war room rhetoric, the Clinton budget does nothing to save Social Security. If my colleagues do not believe me, they should listen to this. In February, David Walker, the Comptroller General of the United States, stated, and I quote, ``The President's proposal does not alter the projected cash flow imbalances in the Social Security program.'' It is true. The President's proposal does not save Social Security. The only way that Clinton's numbers add up is through a faulty double- counting scheme. This is not a Republican complaint. Some of Social Security's chief defenders, members of the President's party, have said that the President's approach is based largely on imaginative accounting. We do not need any more shell games and number schemes for Social Security. We just need a system that can ensure tomorrow's seniors that their savings will be there when they retire without government interference. We desperately need the President to be a leader on the tough issues. We cannot waste this historic opportunity to preserve the Nation's Social Security program. Unfortunately, the President's budget represents his typical rhetoric and sloganeering at its worst.
JOHN LINDER: “sometime during the year 2013, the funds we pay out to Social Security recipients are going to exceed the funds coming…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the Clinton administration's budget and its impact on Social Security.
Share
More from JOHN LINDER
I would like to express my sincere sorrow to the families of those who were killed or wounded in that accident and all mine accidents and remind our friends that this could have been done on unanimous consent without a rule, but since the…
I respond to it that people do not put money under the mattress anymore. Wealthy people spend more than poor people. They will pay a higher share of the total cost of government; but to the extent that they do not spend that money, they…
I do share the Ranking Member's frustration that we are talking about it again, rather than doing something about it.
If you really want to help working families move up that ladder, you have to deal with the payroll Tax Code.





