On the recordNovember 3, 2011
Well, I understand that our staffs have consulted with each other about the utility of this. I don't know how far they have gone with the SEC. But I can tell you the basic outline of this requirement is not to gum up the offering, not to require the issuer to put all kinds of stuff in the offering that can actually obscure the information that the offerer wants to put to the public and can allow the SEC basically to intrude into that offering, but to require one simple link where they can go and get all of the information that any wise investor needs. Mr. McHENRY. Reclaiming my time, we did not see this legislative text until it was filed with the Rules Committee. We worked to try to accommodate the Member with text that could be acceptable. Unfortunately, the construct of this is simply not acceptable and we couldn't come to reasonable accommodation on language that would be workable. Look, the SEC is certainly overburdened. We all know that. I mean, they're working very hard. They currently have two Web sites right now. What this amendment would do is force them to have a third Web site. Furthermore, in the discussion of this amendment, my colleague describes this as a public offering. The crowdfunding legislation described here is an exempt offering, very different in nature than a public offering, and is exempt from the SEC regs.…





