let me give the gentleman a statistic that was sent to me by my friend, a Dr. Whitaker of Warner Robins, GA. In 1913 when the original income tax went into effect, if you had an income of $20,000, your tax rate was 1 percent. If you average out a $20,000 income in 1913 to today's dollars, that would be the equivalent of making $298,000 a year. So for us today to have the same rates as we originally had on the income tax in 1913, someone making $298,000 a year would have a tax rate today of 1 percent. So the tax rate has just gone up and up and up and up, since we know that not to be the case. Even somebody making $20,000 a year would jump on paying the 1-percent tax. Incidentally, the highest tax in 1913, the highest percentage was 7 percent. And now the average for middle-class Americans is about 24 percent, easily 30 percent for many people, and 33 percent and on up.
Jack Kingston: “let me give the gentleman a statistic that was sent to me by my friend, a Dr. Whitaker of Warner Robins, GA. In 1913…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing historical income tax rates and their increase over time.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
Hillary Clinton's numbers are cratering because she's lied to the FBI. She's under a criminal investigation. WikiLeaks is an embarrassment to the Democrat Party.
Today, it boiled down to politics. A question that I would like to know is who was -- who won when General Flynn had to resign? Was that a victory for Russia?
That's what base republicans called Barack Obama. I think that's partisan rhetoric. I don't think it's accurate at all.
I think its possible. I would not give up on it yet I think that Rand Paul realizes that if this thing goes down, his legacy and a guy who may be a future presidential candidate again, but his legacy could be the Republican who killed the…





