And with the Federal presence, guidance, and oversight, but not necessarily Washington bureaucratic micromanagement. Now, I think probably the biggest failure of the Washington bureaucracy to manage a problem is local poverty control. You know, the folks on welfare in Savannah, GA, have to do what the bureaucrats tell them to do in Washington, and it is the same bureaucrats telling your folks in California what to do, and the people in California in Mrs. Seastrand's district have to do what the folks in Arizona in your district do, and you have one Washington bureaucracy command controlling poverty. As a result, since 1964 we have spent $5 trillion on poverty. The poverty rate then was 14 percent, and the poverty rate now is 14 percent. It has not worked. We need local control and flexibility. You know what? I cannot solve Mrs. Seastrand's poverty problem, and I cannot solve Mr. Hayworth's, and maybe I cannot solve mine. But you know what? I can do a heck of a lot better job on mine than I can on yours. Just give me the tools and I think I can do it. That is one reason why you want State block grants. Cut out the poverty brokers and put the control in the hands of the local people.
Jack Kingston: “And with the Federal presence, guidance, and oversight, but not necessarily Washington bureaucratic micromanagement.…”
On the recordApril 16, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for local control in poverty management during a floor speech.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
Dec 28, 2017
I think the president at this point, he's realizing what the American people are realizing, is that this investigation is leading to nowhere, and it probably should be wrapped up very soon.
Feb 15, 2018
This is serious. We've got to unite. We need to quit the circular firing squad.
Apr 30, 2017
I think there should be a lot of concern, Democrat and Republican, on surveillance of American people, during the metadata debate.
Dec 15, 2016
If I was a lawyer you said Mr. President, you said DNC and John Podesta specifically. Yet, you sort of made it sound like they were interfering with the election in general and there's a big difference.





