Tomorrow as we begin the very important debate on a very important bill in Congress, there is an amendment that I plan to support and I urge my colleagues to support, and that is the one offered by the gentleman from Florida [Mr. McCollum]. His amendment actually has different components to it, but I wanted to touch on just a few of them. One of them is that it gives States Federal funds if they adopt truth-in-sentencing laws, and part of the truth-in-sentencing requirement is that violent criminals serve at least 85 percent of their sentence. What truth-in-sentencing laws are all about is they are trying to get to this revolving door problem we are having in prisons right now. Currently the average criminal only serves 37 percent of the time that he or she is sentenced for, and under the McCollum amendment States that adopt truth-in-sentencing laws would have to require that the criminals serve 85 percent of their time.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for a truth-in-sentencing amendment during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
For those who think that relaxing our laws does not create a magnet, they need to go to Central America and talk to the people who would be taking advantage of this. Finally, let me say this about leadership: in split government with three…
But if we can get some of these things off the table-- if we can agree on military pay, if we can agree on the civilian support staff for military, if we can agree on furloughed employees, and if we can agree with NIH, that science and…
I say to my good friend from Tennessee that if you take out the TANF funding, which the Obama administration charges the NIH to conduct business, this is level funding. I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Pennsylvania, (Mr. Rothfus).
Over my years in Congress, I've had the honor of chairing several conference committees. Conference committees are set up when there's a disagreement between a House-passed bill and a Senate-passed bill. You sit down with your list of…





