Republicans, we have been guilty, and Democrats, they have been guilty, have spent this money in the past. But this Congress has not done it, and so the fact that we are having this dialogue is great. Here is a chart from the Congressional Budget Office that certifies that we are not spending social security money. This is a number that came from the Congressional Budget Office or our congressional bean counters on October 27, last week. It said, projected on-budget surplus, $1 billion, under the congressional scoring system. This is from a neutral third party saying that we have not spent social security money. But again, this is historic that we have this opportunity. I kind of get a little bit charged up, and we do have some finger-pointing, some good bipartisan finger-pointing, in the morning, in the 1-minutes, where Members are saying, they are spending the money, they are not spending the money. Well, it is good that at least we consider this debatable, because it has not been. Again, both parties have been guilty of it, but this Congress is different. It is such a great position to be in now. But we have to continue with the waste and abuse or we are not going to be able to have these bragging rights come adjournment next week or next month.
Jack Kingston: “Republicans, we have been guilty, and Democrats, they have been guilty, have spent this money in the past. But this…”
On the recordNovember 2, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing fiscal responsibility and social security funding during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
Jan 4, 2018
It is impossible to remove from the stink of Donald Trump having consistently called for this to happen with a total lack of any additional evidence.
Dec 28, 2017
I think the president at this point, he's realizing what the American people are realizing, is that this investigation is leading to nowhere, and it probably should be wrapped up very soon.
Jan 4, 2018
I often heard during 2016 how important the Clinton Foundation was for the health of world. And now my question would be, if it was such a great foundation, why is it unable to function now that she's not secretary of state?





