on Saturday, March 5, I was honored to participate in a change of command ceremony aboard the U.S.S. Canopus [AS 34] which is a submarine tender assigned to the Kings Bay Naval Submarine Base in my district. As Admiral Ellis, the base commander, toured me around following the ceremony, he mentioned an activity, the cleaning and removal of aquatic nuisance biological species--including nonindigenous species--from the ballast and seawater system components of Navy ships, which I immediately thought you and our subcommittee should hear about. During testimony on H.R. 3360 last year, I did not hear any mention of the apparently lengthy and exhaustive research which has been undertaken by the U.S. Navy in the area of prevention and control of harmful native and nonnative aquatic organisms. Yet, it would appear that the Navy has been working on this problem for more than 7 years, and has made significant progress in developing an effective control methodology.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Navy's research on aquatic nuisance species during a speech about H.R. 3360.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
How much time do we have remaining? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 3\1/2\ minutes remaining, and the gentleman from Virginia has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, in 1733, when General Oglethorpe sailed up the Savannah River, I have been told the river was 12 feet deep. We have been playing in the mud down there ever since. Today, it is 42 feet deep…
May I inquire how much time we have left? The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 8 minutes remaining, and the gentleman from Virginia has 2\1/2\ minutes remaining.
I thank the gentleman for yielding. And I wanted to also say, the gentleman from Maryland talked about a company, and I am not familiar with this company, but a company that is moving out of America because of our burdensome Tax Code. Does…





