proponents of the President's health care plan have been bombarding the leery American public with a PR campaign entitled ``Tell that to the Joe Blow constituent stories,'' and it is always a scenario which is a good scenario about the need for health care reform. But the irony is nobody is debating the need for health care reform. The debate is, Is the crisis so big that we need to socialize medicine or is it such that the free-market-targeted reforms will do the trick? The Michel plan targets reforms and allows the free market to be free, to have competition, and the Clinton plan basically socializes medicine. I truly believe that there are a lot of people who have heartbreak stories out there that we need to help, and the Michel plan is aimed at helping them. We are not debating the need for reform. We are debating socialized medicine.
Jack Kingston: “proponents of the President's health care plan have been bombarding the leery American public with a PR campaign…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the debate over health care reform and the differences between the Michel and Clinton plans.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
Well, I have to say this, number one, the American people always have the right to question the work habits and the work venues of anybody who's elected to office.
His tone at 4:00 a.m. Wednesday morning was magnificent. And I was in the room and I can tell you, it was an inspirational American moment.
I think it's crucial that he absolutely has to fight for it. But I think the American electorate understands that he is fighting Chuck Schumer, a man who voted for the wall in 2006, along with his Senate colleague Barack Obama.
Anytime we change a light bulb, we talk about how great the last one was. And that's what I'm hearing right now from the Democrats.





