Mr. Speaker, I want to get back to something the previous speaker said about the Supreme Court's making a statement that they never came out against school prayer. That was not the case at all. If we look at the Engel v. Vitale case in 1962, a pertinent portion of this debate was when Engel stated, and I quote, ``Neither the fact that the prayer may be denominationally neutral nor the fact that its observance on the part of the students is voluntary can serve to free it from the limitations of the establishment clause, as it might be from the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, both of which are operative against the State by virtue of the 14th Amendment.'' So clearly there is a case where the Supreme Court has said that even voluntary prayer is a problem in terms of their interpretation of the Constitution. Because of that, because of their extreme approach on this, I do support this rule and the Istook amendment.
Jack Kingston: “Mr. Speaker, I want to get back to something the previous speaker said about the Supreme Court's making a statement that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Supreme Court's stance on school prayer during a debate.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
I often heard during 2016 how important the Clinton Foundation was for the health of world. And now my question would be, if it was such a great foundation, why is it unable to function now that she's not secretary of state?
I think the president at this point, he's realizing what the American people are realizing, is that this investigation is leading to nowhere, and it probably should be wrapped up very soon.
But the fact is, no, I don't trust my governors. In South Carolina, perfect example, we didn't expand Medicaid. That meant 240,000 people went without coverage.
He's the kind of optimistic guy who's always going to say, you're going to be very proud of the wall, we're going to build the wall and Mexico is going to pay it.





