Political Quotes

Jack Kingston: If you think about it, how many people do you know in your district in California have been able to provide for their…

On the recordMay 14, 1996
If you think about it, how many people do you know in your district in California have been able to provide for their family based on a 20-hour work week. I would be willing to bet zero. I asked this question of an audience in Georgia recently: How many of you pay for your kids, your house with 20 hours work a week? Nobody. Yet the President vetoed welfare reform because we required in the bill 20 hours worth of work each week for able-bodied recipients, 20 hours. That is all. But it was too much for the President. No tough love here. Veto, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway. That is all he seems to want to protect is the status quo giveaway system. We think he should have some tough love out there. Give a helping hand to those who need it. Give a little push, a living push to those who need that. But it is not fair to America's middle class to be shouldering the burden for those who could be working and contributing.
Said by
Jack Kingston
Georgia

Editor's note · Context

Discussing welfare reform and work requirements during a speech on the House floor.

Share

More from Jack Kingston

Oct 26, 2017

You can't fight a special prosecutor. You can't fight a federal judge when you get in their bull's eye and then you're more likely to talk.

transcripts.cnn.com
Jan 4, 2018

I believe there are very, very valid concerns about the team that Mueller has put together.

transcripts.cnn.com
Sep 21, 2017

I think its possible. I would not give up on it yet I think that Rand Paul realizes that if this thing goes down, his legacy and a guy who may be a future presidential candidate again, but his legacy could be the Republican who killed the…

transcripts.cnn.com
May 3, 2017

This frees us up now because there's $840 billion in tax relief in here that now we can start talking about something that we're really passionate about.

transcripts.cnn.com

Other voices in this conversation