What is also ironic, while he is out saying the Republican welfare reform is mean or inadequate or whatever, not only has he not offered an alternative but then he goes on to talk about our program and how good it is. But he did not use the word Republican. He says, this is what we need: work programs and programs that will end the cycle and get the dad into the picture and identified and so forth. I think it is disappointing, but you were talking about senior citizens and to increase the Social Security tax as your first year in office and then to fight trying to repeal that tax increase does have a degree of hypocrisy to it.
Jack Kingston: “What is also ironic, while he is out saying the Republican welfare reform is mean or inadequate or whatever, not only…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing criticisms of Republican welfare reform and the hypocrisy of tax policy.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
I often heard during 2016 how important the Clinton Foundation was for the health of world. And now my question would be, if it was such a great foundation, why is it unable to function now that she's not secretary of state?
I think it's crucial that he absolutely has to fight for it. But I think the American electorate understands that he is fighting Chuck Schumer, a man who voted for the wall in 2006, along with his Senate colleague Barack Obama.
I think there should be a lot of concern, Democrat and Republican, on surveillance of American people, during the metadata debate.
That's what base republicans called Barack Obama. I think that's partisan rhetoric. I don't think it's accurate at all.





