Again, just to do my duty to the constituents back home, particularly victims of crime, what I am concerned about, if a rapist moves from Georgia to California under current law, he is not tracked. Under the crime bill, he will be tracked. And under this bill, without that amendment, he will still be tracked. We may need to come back, as we always have to, and revisit something down the road. But I do not think that this legislation will diminish the fact that that rapist would be tracked moving from California to Georgia.
Jack Kingston: “Again, just to do my duty to the constituents back home, particularly victims of crime, what I am concerned about, if a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the tracking of rapists under proposed crime legislation.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
Today, it boiled down to politics. A question that I would like to know is who was -- who won when General Flynn had to resign? Was that a victory for Russia?
If I was a lawyer you said Mr. President, you said DNC and John Podesta specifically. Yet, you sort of made it sound like they were interfering with the election in general and there's a big difference.
Actually, if I look at what Donald Trump has done for me and middle class America, he has brought down the illegal border crosses by 60 percent. He has renegotiated trade agreements.
I think it's crucial that he absolutely has to fight for it. But I think the American electorate understands that he is fighting Chuck Schumer, a man who voted for the wall in 2006, along with his Senate colleague Barack Obama.





