I want to throw something in. I was an economics major in college. I did my senior year term paper on the Russian agriculture system. I wish I could remember all the statistics, but the Government collective farms, which basically the farmers of Russia had to give all their food to the Government, they allowed the individual farmers to keep or, excuse me, to use 25 percent of their land for their own food production. It turned out, on that 25 percent of the land that the farmers would keep all their production on, that produced more crops than the entire 75 percent in the system that went to the Government. The point is that if people are using their own money, they have a motive to keep whatever is leftover for a college education, long-term health care, they will be a lot more careful than what is happening right now, where insurance companies are going in there and you have bureaucrats spending their money. American consumers know how to spend their money a heck of a lot better than we do in Washington.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the efficiency of individual versus government-managed agriculture systems.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
In reclaiming my time, that's a leap. I'm talking steps. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentlelady from North Carolina (Mrs. Ellmers), a former nurse.
I thank the chairman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, I join the chairman and Mr. Wilson in opposition to this, and I appreciate Mr. Fortenberry's withdrawing because of so much of what has already been said. This project actually is about 70…
If I could ask how much time we have remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Georgia has 2\3/4\ minutes remaining, and the gentlewoman from Connecticut has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
But if we can get some of these things off the table-- if we can agree on military pay, if we can agree on the civilian support staff for military, if we can agree on furloughed employees, and if we can agree with NIH, that science and…





