That is excellent news. Let us take the Social Security completely out and do what the gentleman is proposing in his legislation, build a wall around it. The point I am really getting to, if you are walking down the street and you find a wallet with $100 in it, you do not immediately start thinking, how am I going to spend this? You think about, who does this belong to? How do I get it back to them? That is what we in Washington should be doing with any surplus, saying, whose money is this? How do we get it back to them? That should be our number one question in the context of let us pay off debt, money we have borrowed; but mostly, let us figure out whose money it is, which is not a hard question to answer, and how do we get it back to them, instead of what new programs should we start and what new buildings, airplanes should we buy, particularly when we are losing objects, large objects, like the gentleman has outlined.
Jack Kingston: “That is excellent news. Let us take the Social Security completely out and do what the gentleman is proposing in his…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the handling of budget surpluses and the importance of returning money to taxpayers.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
I often heard during 2016 how important the Clinton Foundation was for the health of world. And now my question would be, if it was such a great foundation, why is it unable to function now that she's not secretary of state?
I think its possible. I would not give up on it yet I think that Rand Paul realizes that if this thing goes down, his legacy and a guy who may be a future presidential candidate again, but his legacy could be the Republican who killed the…
They have to pass the bill. They have made too many promises and there's no escape --
This is serious. We've got to unite. We need to quit the circular firing squad.





