If Charlie Norwood were here today, he would be sitting there and he would be embarrassed. He would be deflecting all of these sweet things that are being said about him. But if this bill was controversial and was having a tough fight, Charlie Norwood would be right in the middle of it and pushing it along and making sure it got done and standing up for the folks outside the 70,000-plus folks who are in line for an organ transplant right now. That is who he always answered to. I remember the Norwood-Dingell bill on the Patients' Bill of Rights, how he did not appreciate the leadership in our party's position on it, so he went out and found alternative ways to get it done. And in that case, he cobbled together a bipartisan group of Democrats and Republicans to push his Patients' Bill of Rights because Charlie Norwood was a fighter, and he was always a fighter for a good cause. So it is fitting and proper for him to be recognized in this bill.
Jack Kingston: “If Charlie Norwood were here today, he would be sitting there and he would be embarrassed. He would be deflecting all of…”
Editor's note · Context
Paying tribute to Charlie Norwood's contributions and leadership in healthcare legislation.
Share
More from Jack Kingston
I think its possible. I would not give up on it yet I think that Rand Paul realizes that if this thing goes down, his legacy and a guy who may be a future presidential candidate again, but his legacy could be the Republican who killed the…
I think it's crucial that he absolutely has to fight for it. But I think the American electorate understands that he is fighting Chuck Schumer, a man who voted for the wall in 2006, along with his Senate colleague Barack Obama.
Today, it boiled down to politics. A question that I would like to know is who was -- who won when General Flynn had to resign? Was that a victory for Russia?
Every Republican, whether he ran for a dog catcher or school board or president -- they all ran on repeal and replace. So they have to do something.





