Political Quotes

Charles Norwood: Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2731 is, once again, a narrow measure with a clearly targeted and very specific goal to ensure very…

On the recordMay 18, 2004
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2731 is, once again, a narrow measure with a clearly targeted and very specific goal to ensure very small employers the ability to defend themselves against OSHA's superior litigation position when the small employer believes they are right. When dealing with OSHA, we now know many small employers are forced to just simply fold their tent, give up because they simply cannot afford the price of justice. As we all know, OSHA has a vastly superior ability to play the litigation game. OSHA has a team of highly skilled, well-seasoned lawyers at its disposal to pressure a small employer and a fully stocked staff to support their efforts. Maybe even more importantly, they do not have to give any consideration to what the cost of this legal activity may be because they know that the taxpayers of America will pick up all of their costs. That is not even a consideration when they determine to take a small business employer to court, and that is the only determination for a small businessman to defend himself. A small employer, in contrast, has to open up his own personal checkbook, go out and hire legal help, help that most of the time, the kind of employers we are talking about, they simply cannot afford. What is more, OSHA litigation is complex, as demonstrated by the thousands of pages of standards, rules and regulations that OSHA has on the books.
Said by
Charles Norwood
Georgia

Editor's note · Context

Discussing H.R. 2731 and its implications for small employers facing OSHA litigation.

Share

More from Charles Norwood

Jul 15, 2004

if, in fact, Mexico was sending us 5,000 metric tons of marijuana, 50 metric tons of amphetamine, and 10 metric tons of heroin, we are not doing really good stopping it with that $40 million. I will tell the gentleman that. Maybe we need…

govinfo.gov
Sep 9, 2004

First and foremost, I would ask my colleagues in the nicest possible way, we really should reject this amendment, and we should do so, frankly, in a bipartisan way. There are a number of things that are going on here, but primarily over…

govinfo.gov
May 18, 2005

I yield myself 2 minutes. In response to the last speaker, number one, had the gentlewoman been here earlier, the gentlewoman would have heard about why this is not an unfunded mandate. Number two, if the gentlewoman believes local law…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 2005

I guess I hope people will remember this debate too because this is one of the debates that ought to be absolutely nonpartisan and ought to have not any political bickering in it. This is about the lives of a lot of human beings that we…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation