Even if they do not call it back up, it is going to tell the American people who to vote out of the Senate in 1996. I mean I know the message sent to me was that we want to stop the spending. The American people know we owe $5 trillion. They know we are borrowing over $250 billion every year, and they know that math does not work. These children in the pictures are in trouble all right, but it is not because we are not funding WIC, and it is not because they are not going to get their school lunch program. It is because in 20 years they are not going to have a way to make a living because we are broke.
Charles Norwood: “Even if they do not call it back up, it is going to tell the American people who to vote out of the Senate in 1996. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing fiscal responsibility and its impact on future generations.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
I guess I hope people will remember this debate too because this is one of the debates that ought to be absolutely nonpartisan and ought to have not any political bickering in it. This is about the lives of a lot of human beings that we…
when the original Voting Rights Act passed this House, it was to correct voting discrimination evident in the 1964 Presidential election. The legal protections and enforcement scheme in the new law were all designed around that challenge…
I simply ask the gentleman to reconsider our unanimous consent to remove two words that would, I think, make an amendment that is going to pass better in your mind.
it is a pleasure to yield 2\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Sam Johnson), another of our subcommittee chairmen.





