I have absolute proof that Dave Lauriski comes from the private sector, and I am delighted that he comes from the private sector to bring to us new and innovative ideas on health and safety for our miners. I must oppose this amendment, and let me say that I do so, I believe, for the sake of the health and safety of American miners. Any attempt to slow down the progress of what could be groundbreaking safety technology or hinder its widespread use is just wrong, and that is what this amendment does. This amendment basically is unnecessary because the Mine Safety and Health Administration acted on July 24 to suspend the proposed rule referred to in the Rahall amendment. I do not know the legal mumbo-jumbo, I just know they have absolutely postponed this rule for very good reasons. If we pass this amendment, it is not going to allow us, perhaps, to write a rule that involves the new technology that could be the technology that saves a lot of lives. This amendment carries with it certain unintended consequences that is going to run counter to the interests of promoting workers' health. MSHA made the decision to postpone the implementation of the rule because of the first field test of new coal dust technology, called personal dust monitors, PDMs, which are very expensive and could be very life-saving for miners. These tests showed such genuine promise that MSHA concluded that additional tests were needed before moving forward with the proposed rule.
Charles Norwood: “I have absolute proof that Dave Lauriski comes from the private sector, and I am delighted that he comes from the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to mine safety technology during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
this month a bill to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants was introduced in the United States Senate. I think we should send a very clear message to the other body not to waste their time or ours on any bill dealing with the status of…
though I was absent on Wednesday, November 9, 2005, for medical reasons, I wish to have my intended votes recorded in the Congressional Record for the following votes: Rollcall vote 577 on H. Res. 539--``aye''; rollcall vote 578 on H. Res…
the protection we have enjoyed here at home since we took the fight to the enemy has been purchased with the sacrifices of our men and women in uniform. The very least we can do in return is to show them honor and respect when they come…
I cannot help but add or repeat so our Members know, the amendments that were not accepted from the Democrats had nothing to do with these bills. They were simply not germane, and I know that upsets them, but those are the rules of House…





