No. And, more importantly, maybe I do not believe it has been, but neither has GAO or the Congressional Budget Office. I talked about that when we first started. In their hearings before us, they had made more than a few comments about the fact that they were not sure we had this together enough yet, and what we are doing is we are making sure now, because we have rushed into this and perhaps did not take the best contract. We have got our military retirees, our active duty dependents that do not have access to care. Their care is going up. I cannot speak to the quality, but one has got to question it when you start reducing the dollars in it. We have got these, and then we have got other citizens, small business people who have a small office. They are being attacked by this giant insurance company saying, You better come to work for me because I put out a $1.7 billion bid and I can't fix teeth. I've got to have dentists to do that. You guys come to work for me, or we're going to spread your name around town as being unselfish or unwilling to cooperate. That is hard to take for a small business, and that is what a little dental office is. They are being picked on by this giant conglomerate of insurance companies, where they are trying to force them to come to work and not be able to make a living. Then they have done worse than that. We will get into that in just a minute, too.
Charles Norwood: “No. And, more importantly, maybe I do not believe it has been, but neither has GAO or the Congressional Budget Office. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the impact of insurance companies on small dental practices and military dependents' access to care.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
First and foremost, I would ask my colleagues in the nicest possible way, we really should reject this amendment, and we should do so, frankly, in a bipartisan way. There are a number of things that are going on here, but primarily over…
as my colleague from Texas knows, the electricity title is very, very important to my consumers and my constituents in the southeast as well as in the northwest, and one of the provisions in the title that is not there is regarding…
I simply ask the gentleman to reconsider our unanimous consent to remove two words that would, I think, make an amendment that is going to pass better in your mind.
44. Lance Corporal Russell P. White 45. Private First Class Daniel B. McClenney 46. Lance Corporal Juston Tyler Thacker 47. Staff Sergeant Robert K. McGee 48. Specialist Julie R. Hickey 49. Specialist Juan Torres 50. Sergeant Bobby E…





