let me rise to support this amendment. This language really needs to go to conference. It needs to be in the bill. There are too many people placed in special education that should not be in special education, and that harms the system and it also harms those that should be in special education and the dollars that flow to them. All I am saying is let us put the right people in special ed, and those that should not be there not be there. This amendment was read earlier stating, ``The term `specific learning disability' means a disorder due to a medically detectable and diagnosable physiological condition relying on physical and scientific evidence,'' and then the reading stopped. The important part of this language is, and I continue, ``and not based on subjective criteria.'' I do not know that part was not read out, but that is the part that is so important because that is why so many people are in special education that should not be in special education. I urge Members to pass this and we will get into conference and talk further.
Charles Norwood: “let me rise to support this amendment. This language really needs to go to conference. It needs to be in the bill. There…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting an amendment related to special education during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Charles Norwood
tonight is part three on the judges of Madison County, Illinois. As I promised last week, I am back on the floor tonight to talk about a place that has the dubious distinction of being America's number one ``judicial hellhole,'' Madison…
when the original Voting Rights Act passed this House, it was to correct voting discrimination evident in the 1964 Presidential election. The legal protections and enforcement scheme in the new law were all designed around that challenge…
I actually did not know who to come to talk to because we did not know who would be leading against this amendment. If I may, it is a very, very simple drafting error in the bill on line 7 where we are saying that law enforcement personnel…
this rule, which I support, will allow one of the most critical actions to date in the war on terror. Hardly a charade. This action is not military in nature. It is entirely political. But it will determine victory or defeat as surely as…





