I rise just to see if I got this straight. Yesterday we heard some very interesting arguments about interpreting the rules of this House so broadly that the potential scope of the jurisdiction of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, according to folks on the other side, knows no bounds whatsoever and that the committee should, indeed can and indeed should, as they say on the other side, investigate all sorts of things. We have heard additional ones this morning perhaps that they want the committee to go into. I think I have that right on their side, and I think also I have right their position on the other side that the modest increase in funds that we are proposing in funds on this resolution to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight is too much money. So on the one hand, they want the most expansive reading of the jurisdiction of this committee, and on the other hand, they do not want the funds to do it. Something is not right here, Mr. Speaker.
Bob Barr: “I rise just to see if I got this straight. Yesterday we heard some very interesting arguments about interpreting the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the funding and jurisdiction of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight.
Share
More from Bob Barr
I think there does need to be transparency in the process once the firm is in resolution with the opportunity for judicial review.
the Republicans seem to have and what they are sort of portraying to the country is a party that cares more about simply staying in office than doing the right thing.
when American leaders convened on Monday, December 8, 1941, they knew three things: They knew America was at war; they knew that the mechanism that had been designed to alert America to impending danger had failed; and they knew that the…
I support this resolution. I support this legislation. However, we ought to be here this evening debating a declaration of war. Somebody once said that if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it looks like a duck, then it is…





