I am somewhat at a loss for words here, after having sat here and listened even in the wake of the rather irrational debate last year by some of those who opposed the constitutional amendment similar to that which we are proposing today, who took the well of this great body and quite with a straight face said they did not know what the flag of the United States of America was, because the debate, and I hesitate to use that word, the shouting on the other side today, the indeed literal raving on the other side against this really is something that I never thought I would witness anywhere, much less in this body. I suppose, Mr. Speaker, that perhaps only in Washington, DC, could people again, quite with straight faces, take the well of this House and call a constitutional amendment that simply gives the right of the people of this country the opportunity to pass laws in the Congress defending the flag of this country, only in Washington could somebody with a straight face call those people radicals, or extremists.
Bob Barr: “I am somewhat at a loss for words here, after having sat here and listened even in the wake of the rather irrational…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing opposition to a proposed constitutional amendment regarding the flag.
Share
More from Bob Barr
I think that we can all agree we need to end the perception of 'too big to fail.'
on April 21, 2002, I introduced H.R. 4561, the ``Federal Agency Protection of Privacy Act.'' I was pleased to be joined by several cosponsors on the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law, including the distinguished Ranking…
The terrorist attacks on this Nation that occurred on September 11 did not occur because of freedoms that we have in this country under our Constitution. They did not exist because our Constitution guarantees all of us the right to be free…
An earmark of a terrorist seems to be somebody who supports presidential candidates Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin.





