I would like to see it do double that amount.

By losing those markets, it doesn't mean those jobs are coming back here.

I would put our workers up against anyone else's workers, I would put the quality of our products up against the quality of products that, you know, China is making, and we will win.

They didn't do anything to build that sustainability, to help Thailand build--and that is a fundamental difference in how we engage in the world and how the Chinese engage in the world.

Doing otherwise would create a vacuum filled instantly by terrorist threats, not just to the United States, but to the free world.

Sixteen years. For 16 years, Americans soldiers have been sacrificing their lives in Afghanistan to secure the future of that country and to protect our citizens at home.

Congress appropriated more than $33 billion in assistance from 2002 to 2016.

It is about our national security, which is tangentially related to the popularity, but not directly.

What are we doing to change our tactics to get a better response for the money that the American taxpayers are spending?

Though the previous administration attempted to bring a symbolic close to the combat mission in Afghanistan, in reality, America's longest war is still ongoing.

In announcing our new national strategy for the conflict, the President laid out an important truth that should have guided our policies all along, that despite the enormous cost, we can't leave without resolution.

I hope Ambassador Wells, the acting head of both offices, will share her thoughts whether this will increase operational efficiencies.