How do we balance that to avoid conflict in the future?

I think the first step here has to be a recognition and a discussion within the United States about where we want to be in 20 or 30 years in Asia.

I think we have been distracted as a Nation, and we need to focus where we are going to be 50 years from now or 100 years from now.

No bank or entity is too large not to sanction, to keep that maximum pressure campaign.

I see them being very aggressive, and it is putting the squeeze on them.

China is being the aggressor. You know, we have seen what they have done, just their actions.

If we don't come to terms with them...what I saw the initiative coming out of the White House is a strong stance, like stop.

The world is going through a tectonic shift in world powers we haven't seen since World War II.

We see that as a tool that we have for an administration to direct foreign policy.

We need a game plan.

You either align with people that are going to follow the rule of law and honor contracts or people that are going to tell you I am not militarizing the South China Sea, yet they turn around and do it.

Our main adversary in this competition, the People's Republic of China, is the master of generational strategies.