I have never asked something of you like this, but please, each one of you should go on the record with the President, the future President, as to what your red lines are.

I mean, when I am hearing these things and people say that trying to move forward with sanctions is tantamount to saying that we need to invade Iran to me is just not acceptable.

It just seems to me that understanding the nature of this regime, we may never be able to actually have an agreement that works, just given who they are, but why would you go easy on sanctions?

So I think the red line for Congress should be no enrichment.

I think this needs to be a proactive priority, of course, for the Congress, but also for the administration.

the notion that you are going to get a nuclear agreement with a regime who will not even return a pastor who is wrongly imprisoned, give me a break.

We passed in the House a bill that would have grandfathered in the plans, and I think that we should do that.

I may suffer political damage. So I am going to do it anyway.

There was a decision by the Administration, a knowing decision, to launch a website that did not work and indeed, was not adequately tested for security.

Which is exactly why my skepticism remains, because, from their perspective, getting involved in these negotiations... is just buying them time.

I don't believe--I could see how some people because of the sanctions would see a need from an Iranian perspective to have a deal, but I just don't think somebody who is representing the regime's perspective would actually believe that…

I think one of the things was, there were political imperatives here and the politics trumped what would work and what would be best for the American people.