Marco Rubio

I think we would not have the keen interest that we do have in the annual list and in the movement of countries among those lists, if it did not matter.

Modern-day slavery is real. Many people think slavery is a relic of the past.

We have to increasingly be able to justify to the American people why, at a time when we have such extraordinary challenges domestically, we are still engaged globally.

I introduced a bill along with Senator Cardin and Representatives Poe and Connelly in the House.

We live in a time where everybody wants to balance the budget. But the only thing they are in favor of doing is cutting foreign aid.

The reason the compliance issue is so important, in particular to me, is because I think the American public, besides a Member of Congress, have a right to know.

I do not support unilateral reductions by the United States as an effort of good will to the world.

I hope that you agree, that the public has a right to know whether or not the U.S. Government believes that Russia is in violation or of noncompliance of any of these treaties.

While it is not being considered today, it is something that could potentially be considered in the future.

I just wanted to ask, is the United States fully clear with the Philippines on what the mutual defense treaty does or does not cover in the scenario of an armed conflict in the South China Sea?

It is tough to enter into future treaties with people that are not complying with existing ones.

Are they in compliance?

I just would ask you to consider, since you said it is an issue you need to think about some more, why the United States should even be funding agencies or organizations that recognize entities that espouse anti-Semitism.

Our relationships in East Asia are of central importance to America's interests overseas.

I am increasingly concerned is an emerging very serious human rights crisis around the world that involves religious liberty.

I certainly agree that designations need to be made as part of a dynamic process.

Should not our foreign aid reflect our values as well as our interests?

Our foreign policy should not just reflect our interests; it should also reflect our values.

Our hope is, if you are confirmed, you will not just monitor and bring attention but that you will be a forceful advocate on behalf of those who are being oppressed.

This is still one of the world's remaining Communist countries.

I raise these points because I think sometimes in the past being on the right side and issuing a communique or statement is not enough.

I think is an essential human right.

Did the administration seek or receive any input from our NATO allies, ahead of the President's announcement, 2 weeks ago, about additional cuts to U.S. strategic nuclear arsenal?

If confirmed, we will work effectively with these partners so that voice of moderation and there is less polarization.

I disagree with those who say that the terrorist attack in Boston has no bearing on the immigration debate.