Political Quotes

Earl Hutto: when the assault weapon ban bill is considered I shall vote no. I am persuaded that the bill may be more expansive than…

On the recordMay 5, 1994
when the assault weapon ban bill is considered I shall vote no. I am persuaded that the bill may be more expansive than the 19 weapons mentioned. This was not an easy decision for me. I support the constitutional right to have and bear arms, but we must do something about the onslaught of millions of dangerous guns that are easily obtainable by those who senselessly kill innocent people in our country. I call on the NRA to take a new direction. The NRA is intransigent. Its leaders constantly whip their membership into a frenzy in believing all their guns are going to be taken away. Hiding behind the second amendment and calling only for stricter law enforcement is not enough. The NRA should take the lead in coming up with a national plan to reduce the availability of guns and level of violence in America while maintaining the constitutional right of Americans to hunt and to protect their homes.
Said by
Earl Hutto
Democratic · Florida

Editor's note · Context

Opposing the assault weapon ban bill and addressing gun violence and the NRA's role.

Share

More from Earl Hutto

Feb 24, 1994

I rise today in support of the Armey amendment. I have heard from many of my constituents in the Florida Panhandle who adamantly oppose the vague language in H.R. 6 that could put home and private schools in jeopardy. A clarifying…

govinfo.gov
Feb 24, 1994

I rise today in support of the Armey amendment. I have heard from many of my constituents in the Florida Panhandle who adamantly oppose the vague language in H.R. 6 that could put home and private schools in jeopardy. A clarifying…

govinfo.gov
Mar 17, 1994

In response, I would say that simply for a number of years the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Stenholm] and a number of us have worked on what we call a real balanced budget amendment. I do not see the fear that others might have of this. If we…

govinfo.gov
Mar 17, 1994

I was talking about the supermajority of the Stenholm balanced budget amendment, because this would be the only way that we would be able to increase the deficit is by a 60-percent vote, and I do not intend to imply that you had a vote…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation