I was talking about the supermajority of the Stenholm balanced budget amendment, because this would be the only way that we would be able to increase the deficit is by a 60-percent vote, and I do not intend to imply that you had a vote, because I understand under your recession clause, you do not have to vote if you have the recession there, period, for two quarters.
Earl Hutto: “I was talking about the supermajority of the Stenholm balanced budget amendment, because this would be the only way that…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Stenholm balanced budget amendment.
Share
More from Earl Hutto
In response, I would say that simply for a number of years the gentleman from Texas [Mr. Stenholm] and a number of us have worked on what we call a real balanced budget amendment. I do not see the fear that others might have of this. If we…
when the assault weapon ban bill is considered I shall vote no. I am persuaded that the bill may be more expansive than the 19 weapons mentioned. This was not an easy decision for me. I support the constitutional right to have and bear…
I rise today to pay tribute to our late colleague, the Hon. Sam Hall of Texas. This gentleman is remembered by all as a person of the highest integrity. It was a pleasure for me to serve here in the House with Sam Hall for several years…
I rise in opposition to the Wise-Price- Pomeroy-Furse amendment. Every member of this body knows what a true balanced budget amendment would mean to the congressional budget and appropriations process. My friend and colleague, Charlie…





