We all know that there is a disagreement with the Supreme Court decision or a couple of Supreme Court decisions. That is no revelation. That is why we are here today. For anyone who has not figured that out, we are here because we believe the Supreme Court wrongly applied the test that the gentleman from Florida is talking about, and other doctrines that have been developed over the years, to the case of flag burning. That is why we are here. We are driven to this because, as a last resort, we are going to amend the Constitution to correct the mistake that they made.
Charles T. Canady: “We all know that there is a disagreement with the Supreme Court decision or a couple of Supreme Court decisions. That is…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need to amend the Constitution regarding Supreme Court decisions on flag burning.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
America's farming community plays a vital role in the prosperity of the nation.
Given these pressures, farmers should not have to contend with government agencies that overstep regulatory boundaries set by Congress.
The gentlewoman is certainly aware that the Supreme Court has required judicial bypass. And if a judicial bypass procedure is not available, the State law is invalid and unenforceable.
The important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…





