This is a very simple bill. It amends a statutory provision, which I will read. It is short enough for us to read right here and see what is being amended. The prohibition is this: ``Whoever using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce knowingly transfers obscene matter to another individual who has not attained the age of 16 years, that is currently in the statute, the bill raises that to 18 years, knowing that such other individual has not attained the age of, raised from 16 years to 18 years, or attempts to do so shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.'' But it requires the use of the mail or other facilities or means of interstate or foreign commerce.
Charles T. Canady: “This is a very simple bill. It amends a statutory provision, which I will read. It is short enough for us to read right…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a bill to raise the age limit for transferring obscene matter from 16 to 18 years.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
The important thing to understand, some people in the land use context do assert that they should have the right to the highest and best economic use of their property, but they do not, and they should not. Zoning has never permitted that…
No one is excluded from this protections of the amendment any more than people or ideas are excluded by the words ``in God we trust'' here on the wall of this Chamber.
What is required is that there be a meaningful application and that these steps be gone through as they are permitted under the local process.
Given these pressures, farmers should not have to contend with government agencies that overstep regulatory boundaries set by Congress.





