So, under that scenario, Mr. Chairman, individuals who had qualified under the laws of their States, individuals who had been nominated by their parties to stand for election, would stand disqualified as of that date, and there would be a wild scramble all over the country to fill in those slots. I do not think that is an orderly way to go about business. That is a flaw in the amendment that I suggest has not been adequately considered. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Charles T. Canady: “So, under that scenario, Mr. Chairman, individuals who had qualified under the laws of their States, individuals who had…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about a proposed amendment affecting election candidates.
Share
More from Charles T. Canady
The gentlewoman is certainly aware that the Supreme Court has required judicial bypass. And if a judicial bypass procedure is not available, the State law is invalid and unenforceable.
The statement in the letter is absolutely accurate. The terminology that happens to be applied to the procedure is not what is at issue. It is a matter of fact, however, that the procedure which exists, which is used, which would come…
This is a very simple bill. It amends a statutory provision, which I will read. It is short enough for us to read right here and see what is being amended. The prohibition is this: ``Whoever using the mail or any facility or means of…
America's farming community plays a vital role in the prosperity of the nation.





