Political Quotes

On the recordApril 30, 2003
Mr. Chairman, first I appreciate the bipartisan support for the amendment. Secondly, I think it would be worth taking this 2 minutes to try to read what is actually in this amendment so we will know what we are voting for. It is a technical amendment, it clarifies and consolidates a series of GAO reports that were added during the consideration of the bill by the Committee on Education and Workforce. It redefines the percentage of funds that the State can reserve out of its State level activities for programs designed to serve children with disabilities with high cost, special education-related services needs to reflect the common understanding. It updates authorization levels that were modified by the fiscal year 2004 budget resolution. This level reflects the increased funding in the fiscal year 2004 budget resolution included for IDEA Part B State Grants. It clarifies that evaluations are provided to children in the language and form designed to obtain useful information and includes longstanding terminology used throughout the implementing regulations and elsewhere in the Act. It modifies language in the section prohibiting the Federal control of curriculum to ensure that this exact language is included in the No Child Left Behind Act. This is an important change, by the way, that ensures consistent language addressing local control over the curriculum.
Said by
Michael Castle
Delaware

Editor's note · Context

Discussing a technical amendment related to special education funding and local control in the No Child Left Behind Act.

Share

More from Michael Castle

Jun 24, 2010

I rise in support of the DISCLOSE Act. I believe that this is relatively simple. I think that all of us in this country have a right to know who is putting forth ads for or against candidates as the campaigns run on. This act that we are…

govinfo.gov
Jun 2, 2009

We should be the regulators. We shouldn't be tying the hands of the regulator.

congress.gov
May 11, 2009

No Child Left Behind was passed in 2001 to address the achievement gap that exists between poor and minority students and their more affluent peers.

congress.gov
Dec 7, 2009

I think political concerns can get in the way of it all. I hope it doesn't, but that is a part that concerns me a great deal.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation