I have watched these medals. I have never seen a bit of politics in these medals. I just have not seen it. I do not think the limiting of the numbers is really going to alter that. I think a large part now is because you need all those signatures, you just cannot do it in a partisan sense. So I do not think this amendment is necessary. I think it brings in an element of politics that frankly we just do not have in the legislation. So I will oppose it.
On the recordJanuary 26, 2005
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to medals during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Michael Castle
Jun 2, 2009
I believe debating the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is of importance as these entities have tremendous impact on our housing and finance markets.
Mar 25, 2010
The debate about how to reshape health insurance in order to reduce skyrocketing costs, and increase access, has dominated the attention of Congress for the past year. While there are many areas of agreement, Congress and the American…
Dec 7, 2009
I think political concerns can get in the way of it all. I hope it doesn't, but that is a part that concerns me a great deal.
Jun 2, 2009
While the GSEs are important, we also need to consider other aspects of housing finance and their role in the market moving forward.





