But I think the president understands what`s at stake. And certainly, he`s prepared to give voice to those concerns.

Our economy isn`t about people working for capitalism. It`s about capitalism working for people.

We need the president to lead, Congress to act, that we need both to for the People Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, and that they must be done urgently now.

Think of the 26-year-old employee at a company. She`s a star worker, but she isn`t being treated right. She`s underpaid, passed over for promotions. A competitor across the street knows and wants to bring her in at a higher wage, but she…

We will stand by them as they stood by us.

If your companies want to win your business, they have to go out and they have to up their game, better prices and services, new ideas and products. By the same token, competitive economy means companies must do all they do - everything…

There is a home for you in the United States if you so choose and we will stand with you just as you stood with us.

The United States expects, when a ransomware operation is coming from his soil, even though it`s not -- not sponsored by the state, we expect them to act if we give them enough information to act on who that is.

the economic policy of the last 40 years has failed.

How many more? How many thousands more Americans` daughters and sons are you willing to risk? How long would you have them stay? Already, we have members of our military, whose parents fought in Afghanistan 20 years ago. Would you send…

Here's how I look at it. I said the foul line is 15 feet away from the basket, never get me closer than 17 feet, because it really is a matter of the public trust.

What will change their behavior is the rest of the world react to them and they diminishes to standing in the world.

The Afghan troops have 300,000 well-equipped, as well-equipped as any army in the world -- and an air force against something like 75,000 Taliban. It is not inevitable.

The United States cannot afford to remain tethered to policies, creating a response to the world as it was 20 years ago. We need to meet the threats where they are today.

Experts in Wall Street, analysts have said that we`ll create millions of good-paying jobs for years and decades to come, not just in the near term.

The status quo was not an option. Staying would have meant U.S. troops taking casualties; American men and women back in the middle of a civil war.

It was not in the national interest of the United States of America to continue fighting this war indefinitely.

We need to meet the threats where they are today. Today, the terrorist threat has metastasized beyond Afghanistan.

Starting this month, we`re going to begin to relocate -- we`re going to begin relocation flights for Afghanistan SIV applicants and their families who choose to leave. We have a point person in the White House and at the State…

it was time for American troops to leave the U.S., to end this so called forever war.

We did not go to Afghanistan to nation build. Nearly 20 years of experience has shown us that the current security situation only confirms that just one more year fighting in Afghanistan is not a solution but a recipe for being there…

So let me ask those who want us to stay? How many more? How many 1000s more Americans daughters and sons? Are you willing to risk? Already we have members of our military whose parents fought in Afghanistan 20 years ago? Would you send…

Let me ask those who want to us stay. How many more -- how many thousands more Americans, daughters and sons, are you willing to risk? How long would you have them stay? Already we have members of our military whose parents fought in…

the President of the United States stood up and denounced the 1619 Project and then passed an executive order.

the U.S. would not have responsibility for what happened after this, that we`ve been there long enough that it wasn`t our goal to nation state, and that the Afghani people and government and military needs to take care of themselves.