We need to see a draft of this guidance as soon as possible.

Can you give us any assurance that those guidelines will in fact not leave customer agency personnel, expert in agency matters, as decision makers for the security of Federal assets?

I hope people understand there is some risk.

If that were the case, we wouldn't be turning down so many people to come to us for courthouses.

What is the role of somebody who doesn't have any expertise when it comes to security except to do what I do, complain about too much security or I have seen people get in who shouldn't?

I believe that this administration is trying to bring some fresh eyes to all of this.

Now, customer urgency means what, the roof is leaking and people are complaining?

What costs a thousand dollars? You can't even get in those gates.

Apparently, for storage space, the Secret Service is costing us a thousand dollars per square foot.

I am just trying to find out who the decider is.

I appreciate that you have set aside particularly that contract for small businesses and then had them compete for this small business contract in keeping with Federal regulations, so that is good.

You have to understand that you can't expect us to continue to try to protect the Federal Building Fund at the same time that you allow one of your largest tenants to be a decade in arrears.