My goal today is to convince you the court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks. Judicial philosophy is not the same as political parties.
Amy Coney Barrett
The Public Record
Amy Coney Barrett is an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, having been nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed in October 2020. She is known for her conservative judicial philosophy and has been involved in significant rulings on issues such as abortion, healthcare, and administrative authority. Barrett previously served as a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and has a background in law academia, including a professorship at Notre Dame Law School. Barrett's judicial approach emphasizes textualism and originalism, reflecting her commitment to interpreting the Constitution as it was originally intended.
Justice Barrett has declined a request by several students to block Indiana University's mandate. That means the school can legally require students to be vaccinated against the coronavirus.
What`s the interest of the Arizona RNC here in keeping, say, the out of precinct voter ballot disqualification rules on the books?
It is the job of a senator to pursue her policy preferences. In fact, it would be a dereliction of duty for her to put policy goals side. By contrast, it is the job of a judge to resist her policy preferences.
The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so and courts should not try.
Barrett pushed back, insisting no judge's religious beliefs should have any bearing on their interpretation of the law.
If you're asking whether I take my faith seriously and I'm a faithful Catholic, I am; although I would stress that my personal church affiliation or my religious belief would not bear in the discharge of my duties as a judge.
I would have no interest in as a court of appeals judge, challenging that precedent.
I would have no interest in as a court of appeals judge, challenging that precedent.





